Integrasi Environmental Cost of Quality dan Triple Bottom Line Accounting dalam Balanced Scorecard untuk Meningkatkan Kinerja Keberlanjutan Perusahaan

Authors

  • Rachel Hera Rosmarie Perbanas Institute
  • Andi Farhan Nasrun Perbanas Institute
  • Tiolina Evi Nausta Pardede Perbanas Institute

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59945/jpnm.v4i3.1474

Keywords:

Akuntansi Manajemen Lingkungan, Balanced Scorecard, Environmental Cost of Quality, Kinerja Keberlanjutan, Triple Bottom Line

Abstract

Tekanan regulasi dan pasar terhadap praktik Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) mendorong perusahaan untuk menghubungkan laporan keberlanjutan eksternal dengan sistem pengukuran kinerja internal. Namun, biaya lingkungan sering masih tersembunyi dalam biaya overhead dan Balanced Scorecard (BSC) konvensional belum secara eksplisit memetakan aspek lingkungan dan sosial. Artikel konseptual ini bertujuan mengembangkan kerangka integratif Environmental Cost of Quality (ECOQ) dan Triple Bottom Line (TBL) Accounting ke dalam arsitektur BSC untuk memperkuat pengukuran kinerja keberlanjutan perusahaan. Metode yang digunakan adalah tinjauan literatur naratif dengan pendekatan theory synthesis terhadap literatur akuntansi manajemen lingkungan, cost of quality, Sustainability Balanced Scorecard, standar pelaporan keberlanjutan, dan regulasi keuangan berkelanjutan di Indonesia. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa kategori ECOQ berupa biaya pencegahan, deteksi, kegagalan internal, dan kegagalan eksternal dapat dipetakan ke dalam perspektif keuangan, pelanggan, proses internal, pembelajaran dan pertumbuhan, serta perspektif keberlanjutan tambahan. Integrasi ini berpotensi meningkatkan keterlacakan biaya lingkungan, memperkuat keselarasan indikator profit, people, dan planet, serta mendukung kepatuhan terhadap POJK 51/2017, GRI Standards, IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards, dan Taksonomi Keuangan Berkelanjutan Indonesia. Kerangka ini memberi kontribusi praktis bagi perusahaan dalam merancang pengukuran kinerja yang lebih relevan, akuntabel, dan berorientasi nilai jangka panjang.

References

Atkinson, A. A., Kaplan, R. S., Matsumura, E. M., & Young, S. M. (2012). Management Accounting: Information for Decision Making and Strategy Execution (6th ed.). Pearson.

Chehimi, M., & Naro, G. (2024). Balanced Scorecards and Sustainability Balanced Scorecards for Corporate Social Responsibility Strategic Alignment: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Environmental Management, 367, 122000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122000

Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: The Legitimising Effect of Social and Environmental Disclosures: A Theoretical Foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282–311. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210435852

Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Capstone Publishing.

Figge, F., Hahn, T., Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2002). The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard: Linking Sustainability Management to Business Strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(5), 269–284. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.339

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman.

Global Reporting Initiative. (2021). GRI Standards: Universal Standards 2021.

Hansen, D. R., Mowen, M. M., & Guan, L. (2009). Cost Management: Accounting and Control (6th ed.). South-Western Cengage Learning.

Hansen, E. G., & Schaltegger, S. (2018). Sustainability Balanced Scorecards and Their Architectures: Irrelevant or Misunderstood? Journal of Business Ethics, 150(4), 937–952. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3531-5

IFRS Foundation. (2023). IFRS S2 Climate-Related Disclosures. https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/ifrs-sustainability-standards-navigator/ifrs-s2-climate-related-disclosures/

Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing Conceptual Articles: Four Approaches. AMS Review, 10, 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0

Jassem, S., Zakaria, Z., & Che Azmi, A. A. (2022). Sustainability Balanced Scorecard Architecture and Environmental Performance Outcomes: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(5), 1728–1760. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-12-2019-0582

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business School Press.

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001). The Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment. Harvard Business School Press.

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2004). Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes. Harvard Business School Press.

Lansiluoto, A., & Jarvenpaa, M. (2010). Greening the Balanced Scorecard. Business Horizons, 53(4), 385–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2010.03.003

Mio, C., Costantini, A., & Panfilo, S. (2022). Performance Measurement Tools for Sustainable Business: A Systematic Literature Review on the Sustainability Balanced Scorecard Use. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(2), 367–384. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2206

Murti, C. D. (2023). What Is Known About Environmental Cost Accounting? Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Accounting and Investment, 24(1), 84–100. https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.v24i1.16180

Norman, W., & MacDonald, C. (2004). Getting to the Bottom of Triple Bottom Line. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(2), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq200414211

Norreklit, H. (2000). The Balance on the Balanced Scorecard: A Critical Analysis of Some of Its Assumptions. Management Accounting Research, 11(1), 65–88. https://doi.org/10.1006/mare.1999.0121

Otley, D. (1980). The Contingency Theory of Management Accounting: Achievement and Prognosis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 5(4), 413–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(80)90040-9

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2025). Buku Taksonomi untuk Keuangan Berkelanjutan Indonesia (TKBI) Versi 2. https://ojk.go.id/

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2026). Buku Taksonomi untuk Keuangan Berkelanjutan Indonesia (TKBI) Versi 3. https://ojk.go.id/

Pargmann, J., & Berding, F. (2024). Integrating Sustainability in Controlling and Accounting Practices: A Critical Review and Implications for Competences in German Vocational Business Education. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.02314

Silva, A., Maldonado, I., da Silva, M., & Cepeda, C. (2025). Sustainability Balanced Scorecard: Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(6), 324. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18060324

United Nations Division for Sustainable Development. (2001). Environmental Management Accounting: Procedures and Principles. United Nations.

Wahyuni, W., Sumarni, S., Fadilah, N. F., & Nurhalizah, N. (2024). Integrating Sustainability into Accounting Practices: A Review of Social and Environmental Accounting. Advances in Applied Accounting Research, 2(3), 184–195. https://doi.org/10.60079/aaar.v2i3.350

Downloads

Published

2026-07-15

How to Cite

Rachel Hera Rosmarie, Andi Farhan Nasrun, & Tiolina Evi Nausta Pardede. (2026). Integrasi Environmental Cost of Quality dan Triple Bottom Line Accounting dalam Balanced Scorecard untuk Meningkatkan Kinerja Keberlanjutan Perusahaan. JPNM Jurnal Pustaka Nusantara Multidisiplin, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.59945/jpnm.v4i3.1474