Pengaruh Time Urgency  terhadap Autocratic Leadership: Moderasi Self-Perceived Status dan Dampak Employee Well-Being serta Organizational Commitment

Florensia Taslulu; Rina Anindita

doi:10.59945/jpnm.v4i4.1625

Authors

Florensia Taslulu Universitas Esa Unggul
Rina Anindita Universitas Esa Unggul

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59945/jpnm.v4i4.1625

Keywords:

Time Urgency, Self-Perceived Status, Autocratic Leadership, Employee Well-Being, Organizational Commitment, Kongregasi Suster Fransiskan Sukabumi

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pengaruh time urgency terhadap autocratic leadership, peran moderasi self-perceived status, serta dampak employee well-being dan organizational commitment pada Kongregasi Suster Fransiskan Sukabumi (SFS). Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan metode survei terhadap 191 responden yang dipilih melalui purposive sampling. Data dianalisis menggunakan Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa time urgency berpengaruh positif terhadap autocratic leadership, sedangkan self-perceived status tidak memoderasi hubungan tersebut. Autocratic leadership terbukti berpengaruh positif terhadap employee well-being, namun tidak berpengaruh langsung terhadap organizational commitment. Sebaliknya, employee well-being berpengaruh positif terhadap organizational commitment dan memediasi hubungan antara time urgency, autocratic leadership, dan organizational commitment. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa pada organisasi pelayanan berbasis nilai seperti Kongregasi SFS, kepemimpinan yang tegas dipersepsikan sebagai bentuk arahan, tanggung jawab, dan pemberian kepastian kerja sehingga mampu meningkatkan kesejahteraan anggota organisasi. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi terhadap pengembangan literatur dengan menunjukkan bahwa pengaruh autocratic leadership bersifat kontekstual serta dipengaruhi oleh budaya organisasi, sehingga dampaknya terhadap kesejahteraan dan komitmen anggota tidak selalu sama dengan temuan pada organisasi bisnis.

References

Aboobaker, N., Edward, M., & Zakkariya, K. A. (2022). Workplace spirituality, well-being at work and employee loyalty in a gig economy: multi-group analysis across temporary vs permanent employment status. Personnel Review, 51(9), 2162–2180. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-01-2021-0002

Alvi, B., Haider, A., & Ahmed, T. (2020). Leadership styles and Its Impact on Employee Performance with a mediating effect of Organizational Commitment, An empirical study of NHA, Pakistan. Global Management Sciences Review, V(III), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.31703/gmsr.2020(v-iii).05

Benraïss-Noailles, L., & Viot, C. (2021). Employer brand equity effects on employees well-being and loyalty. Journal of Business Research, 126(January), 605–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.02.002

Briker, R., Walter, F., & Cole, M. S. (2021). Hurry up! The role of supervisors’ time urgency and self-perceived status for autocratic leadership and subordinates’ well-being. Personnel Psychology, 74(1), 55–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12400

Gorgenyi-Hegyes, E., Nathan, R. J., & Fekete-Farkas, M. (2021). Workplace health promotion, employee wellbeing and loyalty during covid-19 pandemic-large scale empirical evidence from Hungary. Economies, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/economies9020055

Gu, Q., Hempel, P. S., & Yu, M. (2019). Tough Love and Creativity : How Authoritarian Leadership Tempered by Benevolence or Morality Influences Employee Creativity. 00, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12361

Hair, J. F., & Ringle, C. M. (2022). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). September 2021.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Huang, Q., Zhang, K., Wang, Y., Bodla, A. A., & Zhu, D. (2023). When Is Authoritarian Leadership Less Detrimental ? The Role of Leader Capability.

Janssen, O., & Gao, L. (2015). Supervisory Responsiveness and Employee Self-Perceived Status and Voice Behavior. Journal of Management, 41(7), 1854–1872. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312471386

Landy, F. J., Rastegary, H., Thayer, J., & Colvin, C. (1991). Time Urgency: The Construct and Its Measurement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(5), 644–657. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.5.644

Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22 140, 55.

Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A THREE-COMPONENT CONCEPTUALIZATION OF ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT. 1(1), 61–89.

Panda, A., & Sahoo, C. K. (2021). Work–life balance, retention of professionals and psychological empowerment: an empirical validation. European Journal of Management Studies, 26(2/3), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejms-12-2020-0003

Pizzolitto, E., Verna, I., & Venditti, M. (2023). Authoritarian leadership styles and performance: a systematic literature review and research agenda. In Management Review Quarterly (Vol. 73, Issue 2). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-022-00263-y

Review, B., & Oaks, J. W. T. (2022). Research Design : Qualitative , Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches ( 4th ed .), Creswell , J . W . Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage , ( 2014 ).

Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (n.d.). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling ( PLS-SEM ) Using R.

Rosing, F., Boer, D., & Buengeler, C. (2022). When timing is key: How autocratic and democratic leadership relate to follower trust in emergency contexts. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(August), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.904605

Shen, Y., Chou, W., & Schaubroeck, J. M. (2019). The roles of relational identification and workgroup cultural values in linking authoritarian leadership to employee performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 00(00), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1615453

Siddique, C. M., Siddique, H. F., & Siddique, S. U. (2020). Linking authoritarian leadership to employee organizational embeddedness, LMX and performance in a high-power distance culture: a mediation-moderated analysis. Journal of Strategy and Management, 13(3), 393–411. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-10-2019-0185

Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences Second Edition. (n.d.).

Tang, S., Richter, A. W., & Nadkarni, S. (2020). Subjective time in organizations: Conceptual clarification, integration, and implications for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(2), 210–234. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2421

Zanabazar, A., Yondonrenchin, M., & Baljinnyam, E. (2023). The Impact of Leadership Styles on Employee Loyalty and Engagement. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 8(4), 94–100. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2023.8.4.2048

Zhang, S., Wang, H., & He, Q. (2024). Performance Pressure and Employee Presenteeism: The Joint Effects of Authoritarian Leadership and Independent Self-Construal. Behavioral Sciences, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14030236

Zhu, Y., Mei, W., Nong, M., & Wang, Y. (2024). The unintended consequences of temporal leadership: a multilevel investigation of the effects of temporal leadership on employee silence. Chinese Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-04-2023-0159