Reconsidering The President's Insult Scandal: A Constitutional Critique Of The New Criminal Code
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59945/jpnm.v3i2.444Keywords:
Legal Equality, Presidential Insult, Constitutional RightsAbstract
Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code (KUHP) is a milestone in the long-awaited national criminal law reform. However, the reintroduction of articles regulating the offense of violating the President and Vice President in the new Criminal Code raises serious concerns about the consistency of the Indonesian legal system with constitutional principles. One of the main highlights is the inconsistency with the Constitutional Court Decision Number 013-022/PUU-IV/2006, which previously removed similar articles because they were considered to be the right to freedom of expression and equality before the law. This article examines these provisions through a normative legal approach with a focus on the principle of equality before the law and strengthening it against the constitutional rights of citizens. The results of the study show that the special offense of insulting the president not only threatens freedom of expression but also creates inequality in legal treatment that has the potential to perpetuate the symbolism of power that is inconsistent with the democratic system of the republic. Law enforcement against violations should be carried out through general provisions in the Criminal Code that apply to all citizens without discrimination. Therefore, there needs to be an evaluation and harmonization of the norms in the new Criminal Code so that they are in line with the principles of a state based on law that upholds justice, equal rights, and respect for human rights.
References
Abdussamad, Z., Muhtar, M. H., & Mustapa, M. I. (2024). Historical Evolution of Indonesia’s Legal System (Transformations Across Different Eras). Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi Dan Kajian Hukum, 23(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v23i3.5188
Abdussamad, Z., Triningsih, A., Muhtar, M. H., Lubis, A. F., Widjajanti, W. W., & Agus, D. (2023). Knitting Legislative Meaning: A Review of Disability Education Policy in the Law on the National Education System and Disabilities. Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi Dan Kajian Hukum, 22(3), 355–373. https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v22i3.3830
Agustina, E., Irvita, M., Saharuddin, S., Rahim, E. I., & Muhtar, M. H. (2024). Finding a new direction for Indonesian democracy: Analysis of limitations of the president’s powers in the amendments to the constitution. LEGAL BRIEF, 13(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v13i1.929
Amer, N., Lubis, A. F., Muhtar, M. H., Saija, V. J. E., Putri, V. S., & Setiawan, B. (2024). Implications of the constitution for political neutrality in the dynamics of law and democracy. Journal de Facto, 10(2), 283–302.
Amiruddin & Asikin, Z. (2012). Pengantar metode penelitian hukum. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Arief, S., Muhtar, M. H., & Saragih, G. M. (2023). Upaya pembelaan diri dalam perspektif persamaan di hadapan hukum. Jurnal Yudisial, 16(1), 25–47.
Fathullah, F., Muhtar, M. H., Yustiana, Y., Saharuddin, S., & Syahbana, R. A. (2025). Constitutional Court’s Role in Regional Head Election Disputes: Substantive Justice and Voting Threshold Challenges. JURNAL LEGALITAS, 18(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.33756/jelta.v18i1.30680
Fernando, Z. J. (2022). TELAAH PASAL PENGHINAAN TERHADAP PRESIDEN DAN WAKIL PRESIDEN DI INDONESIA (STUDY ON THE ARTICLE CONCERNING CONTEMPT AGAINST PRESIDENT ANS VICE PRESIDENT IN INDONESIA). Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 11(1), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v11i1.826
Indra, M., Saragih, G. M., & Muhtar, M. H. (2023). Strength of Constitutional Court Decisions in Judicial Review of the 1945 Constitution in Indonesia: Kekuatan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 di Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 20(2), 279–299.
Malau, P. (2023). Tinjauan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Baru 2023. AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 5(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i1.2815
Nandini, N. M. L. A., & Hadi, S. (2004). PERBANDINGAN PENGATURAN DELIK PENGHINAAN TERHADAP PRESIDEN DAN/ATAU WAKIL PRESIDEN DI INDONESIA DAN NEGARA PRANCIS. COURT REVIEW: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum (e-ISSN: 2776-1916), 4(04), Article 04. https://doi.org/10.69957/cr.v4i04.1571
Nggilu, N. M., Ahmad, A., Rivaldi Moha, M., Apripari, A., Muhtar, M. H., Nggilu, N. M., Ahmad, A., Rivaldi Moha, M., Apripari, A., & Muhtar, M. H. (2024). Tribunal Constitucional abusivo: La displasia y el poder destructivo de las decisiones del Tribunal Constitucional. Estudios constitucionales, 22(2), 69–99. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-52002024000200069
Rohmah, E. I. (2023). Pasal Penghinaan Presiden dalam Bingkai Negara Demokrasi. Al-Jinayah : Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam, 9(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.15642/aj.2023.9.1.28-56
Saputro, L. A., & Anwar, A. S. (2023). Menyoal Pasal Penghinaan Presiden dalam KUHP: Antara Proporsionalitas Prinsip Primus Inter Pares atau Kemunduran Demokrasi. WICARANA, 2(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.57123/wicarana.v2i1.32
Suhariyanto, D., Muhtar, M. H., Lubis, A. F., Abqa, M. A. R., Maranjaya, A. K., Mulyadi, D., Rohman, M. M., Amalia, M., Tanesab, J., Junaidi, J., & Abas, M. (2023). POLITIK HUKUM PEMILU. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 JPNM Jurnal Pustaka Nusantara Multidisiplin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
