The Effectiveness Of Mediation As A Non-Litigation Instrument In Reducing Divorce Rates: An Empirical Study In The Religious Court Class 1a Of Gorontalo City

Authors

  • Mohammad Raphael Chinatra Manoppo Fakultas Hukum Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
  • Suwitno Yutye Imran Fakultas Hukum Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
  • Mohamad Hidayat Muhtar Fakultas Hukum Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59945/jpnm.v3i2.445

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the role of mediators in reducing divorce rates through mediation mechanisms at the Class 1A Religious Court of Gorontalo City and to identify the main determinants that influence the success or failure of the divorce case resolution process from legal, psychological, and sociocultural aspects. The main problems underlying this study are the high divorce rate handled by the Religious Court every year, as well as the low success rate of mediation even though there is a normative basis in the form of Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016 which requires mediation efforts in every civil case, including divorce. This condition indicates a gap between the ideality of the law and its implementation in the field. The method used in this study is the empirical legal method with a qualitative approach. Data were obtained through direct interviews with mediator judges, certified mediators, and the parties to the case at the Class 1A Religious Court of Gorontalo City. The results of the study indicate that mediation has significant potential in preventing divorce if carried out seriously and professionally. The success of mediation is largely determined by the capacity and integrity of the mediator, especially in building effective communication, maintaining neutrality, and understanding the emotional aspects of the disputing parties. However, there are a number of inhibiting factors, including the absence of one of the parties in the mediation process, low good faith, lack of certified mediators, and inadequate mediation facilities. Psychological factors such as emotional trauma and unpreparedness to accept compromise are also quite dominant obstacles. In addition, cultural factors such as the public view that still considers the court as an arena for "victory" also make it difficult to achieve a peaceful resolution.

References

Abdussamad, Z., Bakung, D. A., Muhtar, M. H., Apripari, A., Puluhulawa, J., Moha, R., ... & Swarianata, V. (2024). Urgensi pembentukan lembaga mediasi desa. MAJU: Indonesian Journal of Community Empowerment, 1(4), 231–240.

Abqa, M. A. R., Hutabarat, S. A., Suhariyanto, D., Fauziah, N. M., Khilmi, E. F., Meliana, Y., & Muhtar, M. H. (2023). Hukum tata negara: Sebuah konsep dasar dalam menata bangsa. Pt. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.

Amer, N., & Muhtar, M. H. (2023). Pengantar hukum organisasi kemasyarakatan di Indonesia. Hlm. 52.

Bakung, D. A., Abdussamad, Z., Muhtar, M. H., Apripari, A., & Hadju, Z. (2023). Tanggung jawab keperdataan orang tua terhadap anak-anak pasca perceraian di wilayah Gorontalo (penyuluhan di Desa Kaaruyaan Kecamatan Mananggu Kabupaten Boalemo). Jurnal Pelayanan Hubungan Masyarakat, 1(2), 51–68.

Imran, S. Y., Abdussamad, Z., Muhtar, M. H., Bakung, D. A., Wantu, F. M., & Mandjo, J. T. (2022). Pengenalan dan pelatihan mediasi sebagai upaya menyelesaikan perselisihan di masyarakat. Jurnal Pengabdian Mandiri, 1(3), 541–552.

Muhdar, M. Z., & Jasmaniar, J. (2020). Studi perbandingan A’Borong (musyawarah) masyarakat hukum adat Kajang dihubungkan dengan PERMA Nomor: 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Mediasi. PETITUM, 8, 57–70. https://uit.e-journal.id/JPetitum/article/download/766/627

Peppet, S. R. (2003). Transactional mediation: Using mediators in deals. Colorado Lawyer, 32(10), 81–86.

Setiyawan, D., & Muhtar, M. H. (2023). Contemplating the morality of law enforcement in Indonesia. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(10), e1261–e1261.

Sofyanoor, A. (2022). Peran hukum administrasi negara dalam pemberantasan korupsi di Indonesia. SIBATIK Journal: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial Ekonomi Budaya Teknologi dan Pendidikan, 1(2), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.54443/sibatik.v1i2.9

Syarif, M., Ramadhani, R., Graha, M. A. W., Yanuaria, T., Muhtar, M. H., Asmah, N., ... & Jannah, M. (2024). Metode-metode penelitian hukum-hukum.

Wantu, F., Muhtar, M. H., Putri, V. S., Thalib, M. C., & Junus, N. (2023). Eksistensi mediasi sebagai salah satu bentuk penyelesaian sengketa lingkungan hidup pasca berlakunya undang-undang cipta kerja. Bina Hukum Lingkungan, 7(2), 267–289.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-21

How to Cite

Chinatra Manoppo, M. R., Imran, S. Y., & Muhtar, M. H. (2025). The Effectiveness Of Mediation As A Non-Litigation Instrument In Reducing Divorce Rates: An Empirical Study In The Religious Court Class 1a Of Gorontalo City. JPNM Jurnal Pustaka Nusantara Multidisiplin, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.59945/jpnm.v3i2.445