Perspektif Pengambil Kebijakan Administrasi Pendidikan dan Lembaga Pendidikan Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59945/jpnm.v1i4.81Abstract
In the complexity of education policy, it is really difficult to apply how allocate political resources – status, legitimacy, authority, power, interests – precisely. In other cases, it is actually very difficult to formulate the reality of socio-political problems in quantitative measures. Likewise with a number problematic political issues and problems faced will tend to be simplified to adapt to the wishes of the analyst and the quantitative methods used, so that This results in fundamental matters relating to the context of socio-political reality which is behavioral in nature and is considered not to be quantifiable, and tends to be ignored and cannot be described fully. The qualitative perspective of education policy is basically a process of understanding on policy problems so that they can give birth to ideas/thoughts regarding ways to solve them. The education policy problem itself is qualitative in nature so it is a process This understanding is also full of qualitative thinking. Understanding of educational policy problems are born from a deductive way of thinking, a way of thinking that starts from Theoretical insights are translated into more operational and operational conceptual units connected to reality. Theoretical insight itself does not stand alone because it is very depends on the subjectivity of an analyst in perspective on education policy. Differences in insight are not simply due to the nature and type of policy problem, however tends to be caused by different points of view or differences in thought paradigms or different philosophies of thought.
References
Carver, F.D. and Sergiovanni, T.J. (1971) ‘Complexity, adaptability and job satisfaction in high schools: An axiomatic theory applied’, Journal of Educational Administration, 9(1), pp. 10–31.
Chollisni, A. et al. (2022) ‘The concept of creative economy development-strengthening post COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Linguistics and Culture Review, 6, 413–426’.
Hoy, W.K. and Sweetland, S.R. (2001) ‘Designing better schools: The meaning and measure of enabling school structures’, Educational administration quarterly, 37(3), pp. 296–321.
Murphy, J. and Louis, K.S. (1999) Handbook of research on educational administration. A project of the American Educational Research Association. ERIC.
Rahmatullah, A.S. et al. (2022) ‘Digital era 4.0: The contribution to education and student psychology’, Linguistics and Culture Review, 6(S3), pp. 89–107.
Sagala, S. (2017) ‘Konsep dan makna pembelajaran: Untuk membantu memecahkan problematika belajar dan mengajar’.
Shaleha, R. and Shalihah, A. (2021) ‘Analisis Kesiapan Siswa Filial Dambung Raya Dalam Mengikuti Analisis Nasional Berbasis Komputer di SMAN 1 Bintang Ara Kabupaten Tabalong’, Joel: Journal of Educational and Language Research, 1(3), pp. 221–234.
Soepardi, I. (1988) ‘Dasar-dasar administrasi pendidikan’, Jakarta: Depdikbud [Preprint].
Sutisna, O. (1989) ‘Manajemen Pendidikan Indonesia’, Bandung: Aksara [Preprint].
Syahrani, S. (2018) ‘Manajemen Kelas yang Humanis’, Al-risalah, 14(1), pp. 57–74.
Usman, H. (2013) ‘Manajemen: teori, praktik, dan riset pendidikan’.
Zed, M. (2008) Metode penelitian kepustakaan. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 JPNM Jurnal Pustaka Nusantara Multidisiplin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







